# Is the Current Download of OpenEMR 4.1.2 Fully Patched?

**URL:** <https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317>\
**Category:** OpenEMR Development\
**Created:** [August 12, 2014, 1:12am UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317 "2014-08-12T01:12:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse-uploads-openemr.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/b/bb9e4e8ae2ea7faac2e952fd9e38a3ce03aac403.png) [@system](https://community.open-emr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2014, 1:12am UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317/1 "2014-08-12T01:12:23Z")

</div>

**[mike-h30](https://sourceforge.net/u/mike-h30/)** wrote on [Tuesday, August 12, 2014](https://sourceforge.net/p/openemr/discussion/202506/thread/326cde49/#ecd4):

Is the current download of OpenEMR 4.1.2 patched with the most recent patch (#7)? I noticed that the OpenEMR 4.1.2 files have a creation date of 6/13/14. The file version.php has patch variable “$v\_realpatch = 7.” However, patch 7 was released on 6/19/14. Thanks.

Mike

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse-uploads-openemr.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/b/bb9e4e8ae2ea7faac2e952fd9e38a3ce03aac403.png) [@system](https://community.open-emr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2014, 7:48am UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317/2 "2014-08-12T07:48:11Z")

</div>

**[fsgl](https://sourceforge.net/u/fsgl/)** wrote on [Tuesday, August 12, 2014](https://sourceforge.net/p/openemr/discussion/202506/thread/326cde49/#ed38):

The Ubuntu-Debian package, released 6/19/14, is patched to 7 despite the fact that the file name is openemr\_4.1.2-3\_all.deb. It was a bit surprising to see (7) upon initial login.

Brady will have to advise if the 6 day difference was due to final testing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse-uploads-openemr.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/b/bb9e4e8ae2ea7faac2e952fd9e38a3ce03aac403.png) [@system](https://community.open-emr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [August 13, 2014, 10:36pm UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317/3 "2014-08-13T22:36:42Z")

</div>

**[bradymiller](https://sourceforge.net/u/bradymiller/)** wrote on [Wednesday, August 13, 2014](https://sourceforge.net/p/openemr/discussion/202506/thread/326cde49/#433c):

Hi,

Yes, they are using patch #7. Difference in dates is just due to time for testing.

-brady  
[OpenEMR](http://www.open-emr.org/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse-uploads-openemr.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/b/bb9e4e8ae2ea7faac2e952fd9e38a3ce03aac403.png) [@system](https://community.open-emr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2014, 8:23pm UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317/4 "2014-08-19T20:23:47Z")

</div>

**[mike-h30](https://sourceforge.net/u/mike-h30/)** wrote on [Tuesday, August 19, 2014](https://sourceforge.net/p/openemr/discussion/202506/thread/326cde49/#95a5):

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse-uploads-openemr.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/b/bb9e4e8ae2ea7faac2e952fd9e38a3ce03aac403.png) [@system](https://community.open-emr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 8:36am UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/is-the-current-download-of-openemr-4-1-2-fully-patched/5317/5 "2014-08-21T08:36:24Z")

</div>

**[bradymiller](https://sourceforge.net/u/bradymiller/)** wrote on [Thursday, August 21, 2014](https://sourceforge.net/p/openemr/discussion/202506/thread/326cde49/#e998):

yes

oops, disregard this message.