Has anyone tried setting up tracks for trackanything in 4.2

OpenEMR Development
1

teryhill wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

I am setting up the procedures but they are not appearing in track anything only the HPT and A1C show up

Terry

2

fsgl wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

[[embed url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAglfTabrqI&feature=youtu.be]]

3

teryhill wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

Yep did that fsgl but I could not get the procedure to show up in trackanything.

Terry

4

fsgl wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

First attachment is taken from Wiki.

5

teryhill wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

Thanks I will try working with that.

6

teryhill wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

fsgl can you show me where it is on the WIKI all I get is the video, or is that all the documentation?

Terry

7

teryhill wrote on Wednesday, June 24, 2015:

Never mind I figured out the doc you are referring to the the procedure configuration portion of the manual.

Terry

8

fsgl wrote on Thursday, June 25, 2015:

Well, it appears that I lied again.

As explained in this post, Procedures Configuration is not necessary. It had been decoupled.

The track items can be added within the form itself.

3 Serum Glucoses have been plotted in 2089 Demo. Form working fine.

Will need to write a Wiki article to supplement the video. Very confusing the segment about Procedures.

9

fsgl wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

Wiki article done & video annotated.

10

teryhill wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

You are a great Mouse fsgl. Thanks for the hard work, unless you have done a WIKI article you don’t know the work that goes in to one, Thanks for stepping up.

Terry

11

fsgl wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

What? Merely great, not mighty? Just joshing.

Love the pseudo-Italian arias, “mozarella, pizza pie”, etc.
[[embed url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsnImos0Hb8]]

12

teryhill wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

Alexander was not the Mighty, but the Great.

13

fsgl wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

Romans would agree with you, (magnus, as in magnum opus). So would the Chinese, (大, as in 大唐).

Carl Jung, archetypes.

14

teryhill wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

Wouldn’t that be 伟大 not 大唐 .

15

fsgl wrote on Saturday, June 27, 2015:

No, it’s really 大唐.

In addition to the Tang dynasty, every dynasty, Ching, Ming; refer to themselves as “the Great ________”, deserved or not. Tang, however, is the apogee.