# Can a facility be a sole provider?

**URL:** <https://community.open-emr.org/t/can-a-facility-be-a-sole-provider/15972>\
**Category:** Management and Administration\
**Created:** [February 2, 2021, 5:19am UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/can-a-facility-be-a-sole-provider/15972 "2021-02-02T05:19:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AMHA-OR](https://community.open-emr.org/user_avatar/community.open-emr.org/amha-or/32/15433_2.png) [@AMHA-OR](https://community.open-emr.org/u/AMHA-OR)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2021, 1:23am UTC](https://community.open-emr.org/t/can-a-facility-be-a-sole-provider/15972/5 "2021-02-04T01:23:19Z")

</div>

StephenWaite understood mt potentially confusing my question and answered it below.

> [@Can OPENemr serve multiple independent practices?](https://community.open-emr.org/t/can-openemr-serve-multiple-independent-practices/15860/12):
>
> Mike: I think the response to your statement is yes. Mike: Ideally, we need a 'Multi Tenant" where each tenant has access to App / base code. But each tenant sets permissions for access to their dB. Ideally, no other facility Admin has access to another facility’s dB (without permission). [image]

multisite works like the default site

```auto
http://myhost/openemr/interface/login/login.php?site=default

```

with default changed to the name of your new site entered in the setup

each site will have it’s own users not connected in anyway to the other sites

it’s basically a really nice feature for hosting multiple practices with one code footprint and one database server

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.open-emr.org/t/can-a-facility-be-a-sole-provider/15972)._